China is one of the world’s largest auction markets, generating billions of dollars each year. And its ultra-wealthy are cashing into the world of quick returns.But not everyone’s a winner.The insatiable appetite for ancient ceramics is feeding a dark underbelly. More than ever before, counterfeits are flooding in, fooling even the best experts.From the rolling hills of China’s last archaeological site, to the kilns of forgery masters and the private museums of the country’s super rich, 101 East explores the world of Chinese antiques and asks, will human greed destroy this centuries old history?
Just watched this sell on ebay – $3500 for a piece of modern plastic, when will the madness stop? Day in day out is see high prices being paid online and off line for modern/fake pieces. The UK auction houses are filled with modern items described as old, the fraud has now taken a new twist with good quality fakes being deliberately damaged and stapled then consigned by a respected lord of the manner or some upper class toff claiming the piece has been in his family’s estate for years or planting the piece in a prominent place in the house and then calling an unsuspecting auctioneer out to look at a piece of furniture or whatever – you know what I mean you know the rest, whichever way the con is set up the toff usually gets 40% of the proceeds.
Shirley Mueller, MD
For me, this story is very strange. A dealer sold me a fake. Then, he resisted taking it back. To put me further off from returning it, he cited his years of experience handling and selling Chinese porcelain as proof the piece must be authentic. For further ammunition, he threatened to take the case to BADA (the British Antiques Dealers Association) to discredit me. Lastly, he said that he would never sell to me again—
I’m not sure he had to worry about the latter, but it is duly noted.
So, there was tension between the dealer and myself regarding my wish to return the dish I purchased. The seller wanted me to retain it and he would keep my payment. I wanted him to take it back and make a refund. We were at loggerheads.
The censer above just sold on ebay for over 8k, it’s not just ebay where fakes are rampant its every sale room in the country, I get tons of emails a day from people who have bought great looking pieces asking me if it is right or not, whats the point in answering an email from a woman who just bought a great looking Dingyao bowl online for £50 as its now at the point where none of the big rooms will take in anything early unless it has provenance, mind you the big London rooms are not immune to the odd fake slipping through.
As you can see from the photographs below the censer is a very good copy of an 18thc original, but to the trained eye it’s all wrong, my advice to anyone with a little knowledge is always the same, unless you have money to burn DO NOT BUY ANYTHING as a gamble never pays off.
A little knowledge is very dangerous.
On a personal note I love all the repro flooding the market, I used to hate it but now I find I can buy really well as every sale I go to I find gems hidden in a tidal wave of repro, the Chinese buyers sitting at home in China bidding from their computer screen have been burnt so many times their nerve is wobbling & now tend to drop out very early. The London trade rarely come out of London… It’s all up in the air. Merry Xmas readers & a happy new year.
Lyon & Turnbulls recent Asian art sale saw this Kangxi style dragon vase sell for £280,000 shame its worth no more than £1k. Well done L & T
Art advisers and dealers have been building private libraries of auction and exhibition catalogues in a bid to plug gaps in provenance.
A growing desire to understand and prove the provenance of goods in the fake-ridden Chinese antiques market has led to a boom in old auction and exhibition catalogues. This trade has been driven by China’s tens of thousands of art advisers, auction houses and dealers, who in recent years have been building private reference libraries for experts and clients. Book collectors and dealers in Hong Kong and Europe have been quietly doing a thriving business in catalogues for exhibitions and auctions of Chinese arts and antiques.
While China has always had a black market for imported art publications that cost a few dollars each, in-demand catalogues command prices in the thousands of dollars. One of the most sought after, for example, is the 127-page, 1950 catalogue for an exhibition of archaic Chinese jade at Florida’s Norton Gallery and School of Art. Written by the renowned Chinese art dealer CT Loo, the finest examples can be purchased for around $500. Meanwhile, the 244-page Illustrated Catalogue of Chinese Government Exhibits for the International Exhibition of Chinese Art in London, Volume II: Porcelain, has English and Chinese text, and was printed in 1935 and today costs $1,500.
When in 1388, during the first years of the Ming dynasty, Cao Zhao, an author from the Yangtze city of Songjiang, published the Ge Gu Yao Lun (Essential Criteria of Antiquities), he had no idea that 600 years later, his advice to collectors would be the litmus test of a multibillion-dollar industry in 21st-century China.
In essence, what Cao explains is that a concern for authenticity should dominate all other concerns such as aestheticism when it comes to artefacts. The fear of fakes, forgeries and inauthenticity was prevalent in 14th-century China. As the international art press and business media has mentioned at length, these fears are present again today as Chinese auction houses aim for the international market.
Abstract: Chinese ceramic funerary figures are found in many museum and private collections. These figures are often discovered to be restored originals, forgeries or restored forgeries. The Buffalo Museum of Science owns a collection of these ceramic sculptures from ancient China, including the figure, Guard on Horseback (BMS CH296). Damage to this sculpture separated the body from the base exposing an earlier restoration. Access to the interior of the sculpture gave an opportunity to develop a greater understanding of its origin, its fabrication techniques, and its restoration.
Samples from the interior cavity of the sculpture were used for thermoluminescence authenticity dating and thin section analysis of the ceramic body. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to help describe the layers on the surface of the sculpture. Previous restoration materials were characterized and identified through ultraviolet radiation, X-radiography, microchemical and solubility tests, microscopy and X-ray spectroscopy (XRF). The principal objective of this paper is to present the results of these examination and analytical techniques, their influence on treatment decisions and the consequent conservation treatment of this sculpture.
Download the full paper HERE
With the boom in the Chinese economy comes a demand among the Chinese nouveau riche for fine art and antiquities. But all is not always what it appears to be. For generations, Chinese artisans have expertly crafted reproductions of ancient artifacts, but with the arrival of a Chinese moneyed class, the production has ramped up.
In a workshop strewn with plastic, metals and the sound of crickets, craftsmen in the village of Yanjian, in Henan Province, are busy producing bronze works: horses, daggers, bells and ritual vessels — and all made to look like ancient Chinese relics.
After creating molds and casting the objects in bronze, workers place them in acid tubs and bury them underground for months at a time, hoping to recreate the effects of aging and produce works that looks as if they had just been unearthed from an ancient tomb.
Craftsmen with access to the chemical formulas for Chinese artifacts are reproducing them with qualities good enough to fool all but the most knowledgeable experts.
“Of course, we douse them with chemicals and bury them,” said one of the guides at the Yanyunjian Bronze Company, explaining the company’s production techniques and referring to the tradition of reproducing ancient bronze objects. “But this is a lot less disgusting than what they did during the 1970s and 1980s. Back then, they would soak the stuff in urine and animal excrement.”
Chinese authorities have closed a museum which contained scores of fake exhibits, including a vase decorated with cartoon characters billed as a Qing dynasty artefact, state-run media reported Tuesday.
The facility, built in northern China’s Hebei province at a cost of 540 million yuan ($88 million), has “no qualification to be a museum as its collections are fake”, a local official told the Global Times newspaper.
The Jibaozhai Museum in Jizhou City came to public attention after photographs of exhibits were posted online by popular writer Ma Boyong.
“This museum has changed the history of porcelain development in China,” Ma said.
Pictures posted by the state-run China Radio International (CRI) showed a vase decorated with bright green cartoon animals, including a creature resembling a laughing squid, which the museum displayed as a Qing dynasty relic.
An Italian bidder offered a cool $1.7 million for what he thought was an 18th Century Famille Rose double gourd vase at Altair Auctions & Appraisals in Boston, US. Such bids are normally reserved for elite auction houses such as Sotheby’s and Christie’s, but it seems that the sale has stirred some controversy in the art world.
A local Boston newspaper received an anonymous tip, claiming that the vase bore a striking similarity to a 20th Century replica that was sold for just $3,840 in May 2012. It has come to light that the vase is almost certainly the same one, however it seems that sometime between the previous and the new sale, someone managed to forge it’s ownership history, perhaps to fool any potential new buyer about its humble origin.
James Jackson, the Iowa-based auctioneer who originally sold the reproduction vase on May 23rd 2012, claims that: “You could tell from looking at it that the vase did not predate the 20th Century. It didn’t require an expert. It would be like putting a Mercedes-Benz hood ornament on a VW Beetle.”